Review Article
Intellectual disability rights and inclusive citizenship in South Africa: What can a scoping review tell us?
Submitted: 30 May 2017 | Published: 25 April 2018
About the author(s)
Charlotte Capri, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, South Africa and Alexandra Hospital, Western Cape Government, South AfricaLameze Abrahams, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, South Africa and Lentegeur Psychiatric Hospital, Department of Health, South Africa
Judith McKenzie, Department of Health & Rehabilitation Sciences, University Of Cape Town, South Africa
Ockert Coetzee, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, South Africa and Alexandra Hospital, Western Cape Government, South Africa
Siyabulela Mkabile, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, South Africa and Lentegeur Psychiatric Hospital, Department of Health, South Africa
Manuel Saptouw, Lentegeur Psychiatric Hospital, Department of Health, South Africa
Andrew Hooper, Lentegeur Psychiatric Hospital, Department of Health, South Africa
Peter Smith, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, South Africa and Lentegeur Psychiatric Hospital, Department of Health, South Africa
Colleen Adnams, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, South Africa
Leslie Swartz, Department of Psychology, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
Abstract
Background: Intellectual disability (ID) is the most prevalent disability in the world. People with intellectual disability (PWID) frequently experience extreme violations of numerous human rights. Despite greater prevalence in South Africa than in high-income countries, most ID research currently comes from the Global North. This leaves us with few contextually sensitive studies to draw from to advance inclusive citizenship.
Objectives: Our scoping review aims to investigate pertinent ID rights issues in South Africa, synthesise quantitative and qualitative studies, and provide a synopsis of available evidence on which to base future work. We aim to clarify key concepts, address gaps in the literature and identify opportunities for further research.
Method: We followed strict eligibility criteria. Medical subject heading terms were entered into seven databases. Seven reviewers worked independently, two per paper. Quantitative and qualitative data extraction forms were designed. We followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines and registered a protocol. An inductive approach enabled a thematic analysis of selected studies.
Results: By following PRISMA guidelines, 82 studies were assessed for eligibility of which 59 were included. Ten sub-themes were integrated into four main themes: the right not to be discriminated against, the right to psychological and bodily integrity, the right to accommodating services and challenges to rights implementation.
Conclusion: People with intellectual disability face compound difficulties when trying to assert their constitutionally entitled rights. This ongoing project requires serious commitment and action. Statutory obligations to nurture every South African’s human rights naturally extend to PWID and their supporters who forge ahead in a disabling environment.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 6927Total article views: 9935
Crossref Citations
1. Perspectives on access and usage of assistive technology by people with intellectual disabilities in the Western Cape province of South Africa: Where to from here?
Fleur H. Boot, Callista Kahonde, John Dinsmore, Malcolm MacLachlan
African Journal of Disability vol: 10 year: 2021
doi: 10.4102/ajod.v10i0.767