Original Research
Learning from doing the EquitAble project: Content, context, process, and impact of a multi-country research project on vulnerable populations in Africa
Submitted: 27 September 2013 | Published: 06 October 2014
About the author(s)
Mac MacLachlan, Centre for Global Health and School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland; Centre for Rehabilitation Studies, Stellenbosch University, South AfricaMutamad Amin, Research & Grants, Ahfad University for Women, Omdurman, Sudan
Gubela Mji, Centre for Rehabilitation Studies, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
Hasheem Mannan, Centre for Global Health and School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland; Nossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne, Australia
Joanne McVeigh, Centre for Global Health and School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
Eilish McAuliffe, Centre for Global Health and School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
Elina Amadhila, Multidisciplinary Research Centre, University of Namibia, Namibia
Alister Munthali, Centre for Social Research, University of Malawi, Zomba, Malawi., Malawi
Arne H. Eide, SINTEF Health, SINTEF, Oslo, Norway
A. Kudakwashe Dube, Secretariat of the African Decade of Persons with Disabilities, Pretoria, South Africa
Abstract
Objectives: This article reports on the content, context, process and impact of project EquitAble, funded by the European Commission Seventh Research Framework Programme, which brought together researchers from Ireland, Norway, South Africa, Namibia, Sudan and Malawi.
Method: After the 4-year project ended in February 2013, all members of the consortium were asked to anonymously complete a bespoke questionnaire designed by the coordinating team. The purpose of the questionnaire was to capture the views of those who collaborated on the research project in relation to issues of content, context, process and impact of the EquitAble project.
Results: Our results indicated some of the successes and challenges encountered by our consortium.
Conclusion: We identified contextual and process learning points, factors often not discussed in papers, which typically focus on the reporting of the ‘content’ of results.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 8566Total article views: 12900
Crossref Citations
1. Rehabilitation in Africa
Sisay Gizaw Geberemichael, Abena Yeboaa Tannor, Tesfaye Berhe Asegahegn, Asare B. Christian, Gloria Vergara-Diaz, Andrew J. Haig
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America vol: 30 issue: 4 first page: 757 year: 2019
doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2019.07.002
2. Disability research in African Network for Evidence-to-Action in Disability affiliated countries
Callista K. Kahonde, Gubela Mji
African Journal of Disability vol: 13 year: 2024
doi: 10.4102/ajod.v13i0.1517
3. The Rehabilitation Landscape in a Low-to-Middle-Income Country: Stakeholder Perspectives and Policy Implications—A Qualitative Study
Rentia Amelia Maart, Gubela Mji, Linzette Deidré Morris, Dawn Verna Ernstzen
INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing vol: 61 year: 2024
doi: 10.1177/00469580241271973
4. Towards value‐based rehabilitation: an analysis of South African policies for people with disabilities
Rentia Amelia Maart, Gubela Mji, Linzette Deidré Morris
World Medical & Health Policy vol: 17 issue: 1 first page: 108 year: 2025
doi: 10.1002/wmh3.643