Original Research
South African stakeholders’ knowledge of community-based rehabilitation
Submitted: 15 January 2018 | Published: 25 September 2019
About the author(s)
Sarah Rule, Disability Innovation Africa, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South AfricaAnton Roberts, CBR Education and Training for Empowerment (CREATE), Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
Pamela McLaren, Disability Action Research Team (DART), Howick, South Africa
Susan Philpott, School of Education, College of Humanities, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
Abstract
Background: Community-based rehabilitation (CBR) is a complex concept and strategy that has been implemented in diverse ways globally and in South Africa. Internationally, some stakeholders have described CBR as confusing, and this may influence implementation. A southern African study reports that there is insufficient evidence of the understanding of CBR in the region to influence training, policy and practice.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate South African stakeholders’ knowledge of CBR.
Method: This article reports on an electronic survey that was part of a larger mixed methods study. Based on the sample of 86 respondents, descriptive statistics were used to analyse the quantitative data and thematic analysis for the qualitative data.
Results: The majority of respondents had had exposure to CBR, but almost a quarter had no knowledge of the CBR guidelines and matrix. The results revealed varying knowledge concerning the key concepts of CBR, its beneficiaries and its funders. Respondents identified persons with disabilities as having a central role in the implementation of CBR. Problems with the visibility of CBR programmes were noted, as well as misunderstandings by many therapists.
Conclusion: The implementation of CBR, and its goal of ensuring the rights of persons with disabilities, is negatively affected by the confusion attached to the understanding of what CBR is. The misunderstandings about, and lack of visibility of, CBR in South Africa may hinder its growing implementation in the country in line with new government policies.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 4596Total article views: 7328
Crossref Citations
1. ‘I’m not ok, we are not ok’: an exploration into the embodied precarity experienced by disabled people and their family members living in rural South Africa during the COVID-19 pandemic
Joanne Neille
Medical Humanities vol: 51 issue: 4 first page: 454 year: 2025
doi: 10.1136/medhum-2024-013026
2. A Situational Mapping Overview of Training Programmes for Community-Based Rehabilitation Workers in Southern Africa: Strategies for Strengthening Accessible Rural Rehabilitation Practice
Lieketseng Ned, Ritika Tiwari, Lucia Hess-April, Theresa Lorenzo, Usuf Chikte
Frontiers in Public Health vol: 8 year: 2020
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.569279
3. Discourses of Blindness in Visual Impairment Rehabilitation: An Exploration of the Ideological Assumptions Embedded in Rehabilitation Practice in South Africa
Michelle Botha, Brian Watermeyer
International Journal of Disability, Development and Education vol: 72 issue: 2 first page: 307 year: 2025
doi: 10.1080/1034912X.2024.2355343
4. Managers’ perceptions on the implementation of community-based rehabilitation in KwaZulu-Natal
Sithembiso Blose, Verusia Chetty, Saul Cobbing, Nomzamo Chemane
South African Journal of Physiotherapy vol: 80 issue: 1 year: 2024
doi: 10.4102/sajp.v80i1.1965
5. More Than Just Assistive Devices: How a South African Social Enterprise Supports an Environment of Inclusion
Zara Trafford, Erna van der Westhuizen, Shona McDonald, Margi Linegar, Leslie Swartz
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health vol: 18 issue: 5 first page: 2655 year: 2021
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052655
6. Improving access to mental health care at community-based level: the role of rehabilitation care workers
Fatima Peters, Ruwayda Hull, Shireen Damonse, Theresa Lorenzo, Nicole Davids
South African Health Review vol: 27 year: 2025
doi: 10.61473/001c.141636
7. Disability inclusion or exclusion? Insights from rural community-based rehabilitation stakeholders
Na Chen, Caiyun Qi
Disability & Society vol: 40 issue: 10 first page: 2821 year: 2025
doi: 10.1080/09687599.2025.2455545