Original Research
Community-based rehabilitation workers’ perspectives of wheelchair provision in Uganda: A qualitative study
Submitted: 09 September 2017 | Published: 24 April 2019
About the author(s)
Nikola Seymour, Centre for Rehabilitation Studies, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South AfricaMartha Geiger, Centre for Rehabilitation Studies, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
Elsje Scheffler, Centre for Rehabilitation Studies, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
Abstract
Background: The challenges of wheelchair provision and use in less resourced settings are the focus of global efforts to enhance wheelchair service delivery. The shortage of professional wheelchair service providers in these settings necessitates the collaboration of multiple stakeholders, including community-based rehabilitation (CBR) workers, whose role needs to be further understood.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine what CBR workers in three areas of Uganda perceived as (1) the challenges with wheelchair provision and use, (2) the factors contributing to these challenges, (3) the role they themselves can potentially play and (4) what facilitators they need to achieve this.
Method: This qualitative study in the transformative paradigm comprised focus group discussions to gather perceptions from 21 CBR workers in three areas of Uganda, each with an operational wheelchair service, participant observations and field notes. Thematic analysis of data was implemented.
Results: Community-based rehabilitation workers’ perceptions of challenges were similar while perceived causes of challenges differed as influenced by location, historical and current wheelchair availability and the CBR workers’ roles. Their main responsibilities included assistance in overcoming barriers to access the service, transfer of skills and knowledge related to wheelchairs, follow-up of users for wheelchair-related problem-solving, and user and community empowerment.
Conclusion: Community-based rehabilitation workers can contribute in various ways to wheelchair service delivery and inclusion of wheelchair users; however, their capabilities are not consistently applied. Considering the diversity of contextual challenges, CBR workers’ range of responsive approaches, knowledge of networks and ability to work in the community make their input valuable. However, to optimise their contribution, specific planning for their training and financial needs and effective engagement in the wheelchair services delivery system are essential.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 4947Total article views: 38167
Crossref Citations
1. Theories, models and frameworks to understand barriers to the provision of mobility-assistive technologies: a scoping review
Asma Aldawood, Daniel Hind, Simon Rushton, Becky Field
BMJ Open vol: 14 issue: 5 first page: e080633 year: 2024
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080633
2. Qualitative research in physiotherapy: A systematic mapping review of 20 years literature from sub-Saharan Africa
Michael Kalu, Augustine Okoh, Chukwuebuka Okeke, Ebuka Anieto, Michael Ibekaku, Ukachukwu Abaraogu
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice vol: 39 issue: 4 first page: 704 year: 2023
doi: 10.1080/09593985.2022.2028952
3. Wheelchair users function and satisfaction with modified wheelchair and intermediate wheelchair services in Pakistan
Ahmad Ali, Aatik Arsh, Gohar Rahman, Ijaz Ul Haq, Said Farooq Shah
Assistive Technology vol: 37 issue: 2 first page: 126 year: 2025
doi: 10.1080/10400435.2024.2439377
4. Community mobility and participation assessment of manual wheelchair users: a review of current techniques and challenges
Grace Fasipe, Maja Goršič, Mohammad Habibur Rahman, Jacob Rammer
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience vol: 17 year: 2024
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1331395
5. Evidence of community health workers’ delivery of physical rehabilitation services in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review
Miriam Mapulanga, Kabelo Kgarosi, Kuhlula Maluleke, Mbuzeleni Hlongwa, Thembelihle Dlungwane
BMJ Open vol: 14 issue: 5 first page: e079738 year: 2024
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079738
6. Wheelchair user’s perceived access to maintenance and repair services: a qualitative study
Kathryn M. Hiles, Richard M. Schein, Gede Pramana, Mark R. Schmeler
Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology vol: 20 issue: 5 first page: 1351 year: 2025
doi: 10.1080/17483107.2024.2442713
7. Identifying Research Priorities Around Access to Rehabilitation Services in the Kasese District of Uganda: An International Participatory Approach
Jennifer O’Neil, Peter Baluku, Robert Bwambale, Rick Morello, Kira Bullock, Brian Budgell, Jacquie van Ierssel
Health Promotion Practice year: 2026
doi: 10.1177/15248399261426002
8. Community-based Rehabilitation Service Excellence for Sustainability
Boo Ho Voon, Teck Weng Jee, Nur Balqis Shufian, Ai Kiat Teo
Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal vol: 8 issue: SI15 first page: 191 year: 2023
doi: 10.21834/e-bpj.v8iSI15.5078
9. Knowledge and experiences of community health workers in the delivery of physical rehabilitation services in Zambia – A qualitative study of trained community health workers
Miriam Mapulanga, Thembelihle Dlungwane
African Journal for Physical Activity and Health Sciences (AJPHES) vol: 30 issue: 2 first page: 213 year: 2024
doi: 10.37597/ajphes.2024.30.2.4
10. Exploring the barriers to using assistive technology for individuals with chronic conditions: a meta-synthesis review
Jonathan Howard, Zoe Fisher, Andrew H. Kemp, Stephen Lindsay, Lorna H. Tasker, Jeremy J. Tree
Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology vol: 17 issue: 4 first page: 390 year: 2022
doi: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1788181
11. Assistive products for older adults in China: self-reported need, services, and satisfaction
Ailin Mao, Hua Jiang, Liquan Dong, Mei Yan, Yuejian Shan
Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology vol: 19 issue: 8 first page: 3006 year: 2024
doi: 10.1080/17483107.2024.2338134