Original Research

Inclusion of vulnerable groups in health policies: Regional policies on health priorities in Africa

Margie Schneider, Arne Henning Eide, Mutamad Amin, Malcom MacLachlan, Hasheem Mannan
African Journal of Disability | Vol 2, No 1 | a40 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v2i1.40 | © 2013 Margie Schneider, Arne Henning Eide, Mutamad Amin, Malcom MacLachlan, Hasheem Mannan | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 07 July 2012 | Published: 22 January 2013

About the author(s)

Margie Schneider, Psychology Department, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
Arne Henning Eide, SINTEF Technology and Society, Norway
Mutamad Amin, Ahfad University for Women, Omdurman, Sudan
Malcom MacLachlan, Centre for Rehabilitation Studies, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
Hasheem Mannan, Centre for Global Health and School of Psychology, Ireland


Share this article

Bookmark and Share

Abstract

Background: If access to equitable health care is to be achieved for all, policy documents must mention and address in some detail different needs of groups vulnerable to not accessing such health care. If these needs are not addressed in the policy documents, there is little chance that they will be addressed at the stage of implementation.

Objectives: This paper reports on an analysis of 11 African Union (AU) policy documents to ascertain the frequency and the extent of mention of 13 core concepts in relation to 12 vulnerable groups, with a specific focus on people with disabilities.

Method: The paper applied the EquiFrame analytical framework to the 11 AU policy documents. The 11 documents were analysed in terms of how many times a core concept was mentioned and the extent of information on how the core concept should be addressed at the implementation level. Each core concept mention was further analysed in terms of the vulnerable group in referred to.

Results: The analysis of regional AU policies highlighted the broad nature of the reference made to vulnerable groups, with a lack of detailed specifications of different needs of different groups. This is confirmed in the highest vulnerable group mention being for ‘universal’. The reading of the documents suggests that vulnerable groups are homogeneous in their needs, which is not the case. There is a lack of recognition of different needs of different vulnerable groups in accessing health care.

Conclusion: The need for more information and knowledge on the needs of all vulnerable groups is evident. The current lack of mention and of any detail on how to address needs of vulnerable groups will significantly impair the access to equitable health care for all.


Keywords

health care; policy documents;vulnerable groups;

Metrics

Total abstract views: 7441
Total article views: 11681

 

Crossref Citations

1. Inequities in health outcomes and access to health care in South Africa: a comparison between persons with and without disabilities
Jacqueline Moodley, Eleanor Ross
Disability & Society  vol: 30  issue: 4  first page: 630  year: 2015  
doi: 10.1080/09687599.2015.1034846