Original Research
Early detection of communication delays with the PEDS tools in at-risk South African infants
Submitted: 02 September 2015 | Published: 08 April 2016
About the author(s)
Jeannie van der Linde, Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, South AfricaDe Wet Swanepoel, Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, South Africa; Ear Sciences Centre, School of Surgery, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Australia
Linique Hanekom, Department of Speech Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, South Africa
Tasha Lemmer, Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, South Africa
Karla Schoeman, Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, South Africa
Frances P. Glascoe, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, United States of America
Bart Vinck, Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, South Africa; Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, Ghent University, Belgium
Abstract
Method: A comparative study design evaluated the accuracy of the PEDS tools to detect communication delays, using an internationally accepted diagnostic assessment tool, the Rossetti Infant-Toddler Language Scale (RITLS). A convenience sample of 201 infants was selected at primary healthcare clinics.
Results: Expressive and receptive language sensitivity scores were low across all three screens(ranging between 14% and 44%). The PEDS tools had high sensitivity (71%) and specificity (73%) ratings for the receptive and expressive language and socio-emotional domain in combination.
Conclusion: In the sample population, the PEDS tools did not accurately detect receptive and expressive language delays; however, communication delays in general were identified. Future research determining accuracy of the PEDS, PEDS-Developmental Milestones and PEDS tools for children aged 2–5 years in detecting communication delays should be prioritised.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 5896Total article views: 8883
Crossref Citations
1. Evaluating the PEDS:DM Developmental Screening Tool in Zulu and Northern Sotho
Boledi Maleka, Jeannie van der Linde, Marien Graham, De Wet Swanepoel
Language Matters vol: 52 issue: 3 first page: 72 year: 2021
doi: 10.1080/10228195.2021.1969589
2. Developmental Risks in Vulnerable Children from a Low-Income South African Community
Maria N. du Toit, Jeannie van der Linde, De Wet Swanepoel
Maternal and Child Health Journal vol: 25 issue: 4 first page: 590 year: 2021
doi: 10.1007/s10995-020-03111-1
3. Early detection of developmental delays in vulnerable children by community care workers using an mHealth tool
Maria N. van der Merwe, Renata Mosca, De Wet Swanepoel, Frances P. Glascoe, Jeannie van der Linde
Early Child Development and Care vol: 189 issue: 5 first page: 855 year: 2019
doi: 10.1080/03004430.2018.1480481
4. mHealth developmental screening for preschool children in low-income communities
Maria N du Toit, Jeannie van der Linde, De Wet Swanepoel
Journal of Child Health Care vol: 25 issue: 4 first page: 573 year: 2021
doi: 10.1177/1367493520970012
5. Detecting developmental delays in infants from a low-income South African community: comparing the BSID-III and PEDS tools
Shabnam Abdoola, De Wet Swanepoel, Jeannie Van Der Linde, Frances P. Glascoe
Early Child Development and Care vol: 191 issue: 4 first page: 545 year: 2021
doi: 10.1080/03004430.2019.1628027
6. Caregivers’ perspectives of early developmental tele-assessments in challenging circumstances
Maria N. du Toit, Renata Eccles, Kailin Westwood, Marien A. Graham, Jeannie van der Linde
South African Journal of Communication Disorders vol: 71 issue: 1 year: 2024
doi: 10.4102/sajcd.v71i1.1037