Opinion Paper
Inclusion, universal design and universal design for learning in higher education: South Africa and the United States
Submitted: 22 March 2018 | Published: 29 July 2019
About the author(s)
Elizabeth M. Dalton, Department of Communicative Disorders, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, United States; and, Dalton Education Services International, Hope Valley, Rhode Island, United StatesMarcia Lyner-Cleophas, Disability Unit, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
Britt T. Ferguson, Special Education, National University, San Diego, United States
Judith McKenzie, Disability Studies Division, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
Abstract
Around the world, institutions of higher education are recognising their responsibilities to achieve the full inclusion of individuals with differing needs and/or disabilities. The frameworks of universal design (UD) and universal design for learning (UDL) offer unique ways to build inclusiveness in our systems. The role of UD and UDL to strengthen successful inclusion of persons with differing needs in higher education programmes is presented from literature, inclusive of national and international policies and resources. Examples from South African and US institutions of higher learning are shared. Discussions of online accessibility, environmental issues, professional development, barriers to inclusion and recommendations for future development in an international context provide a vision for developing inclusive learning environments in higher education.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 10497Total article views: 13743
Crossref Citations
1. Evidence-based training approach for higher education faculty: brief model of inclusion and training of the disabled
Gulnaz Zahid
International Journal of Educational Management vol: 35 issue: 6 first page: 1151 year: 2021
doi: 10.1108/IJEM-04-2021-0150