Original Research

Assistive technologies in employment and entrepreneurship: Graduates with sensory disabilities

Sibongile Xashimba, Marlene de Beer
African Journal of Disability | Vol 15 | a1998 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v15i0.1998 | © 2026 Sibongile Xashimba, Marlene de Beer | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 11 February 2026 | Published: 29 May 2026

About the author(s)

Sibongile Xashimba, Department of Social Work and Community Development, Faculty of Humanities, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
Marlene de Beer, Department of Social Work and Community Development, Faculty of Humanities, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa

Abstract

Background: Across practice and policy, assistive technologies (ATs) are positioned as a pathway to economic inclusion for graduates with sensory disabilities in South Africa. Still, systemic barriers persist. Developing workable interventions requires in-depth attention to the lived experiences of graduates, which include knowledge on the way devices, systems and attitudes interact in everyday employment seeking and enterprise activities.
Objectives: The study endeavoured to examine how unemployed tertiary-level graduates with sensory disabilities in Gauteng use AT in seeking employment and practising entrepreneurship. Specific enablers and challenges were identified to provide an explanation of variation in economic participation.
Method: Interpretive methods guided the study within a qualitative design. Sixteen participants took part in semi-structured interviews: 10 unemployed graduates (with visual or hearing impairments), three human resources professionals and three helping professionals. Coding and analytic development followed Braun and Clarke’s six-phase thematic approach.
Results: Overall patterns were organised into six themes: (1) discrimination and stigma, (2) accessibility, (3) use and effectiveness of AT, (4) training and support, (5) institutional and government support, and (6) self-initiated strategies and adaptation.
Conclusion: Device access proved insufficient. Most constraints operated at the system level, consistent with the social model of disability, as stigma, accessibility failures, limited training and weak enforcement shaped outcomes. Sustained change had to address stigma, accessibility, training and support and accountable policy implementation through coordinated multi-stakeholder action.
Contribution: By centring graduate voices, this article contributed evidence on adaptability and multi-stakeholder lenses relevant to inclusive policy and practice in resource-constrained settings.


Keywords

assistive technologies; unemployment; sensory disabilities; social model of disability; entrepreneurial opportunities; graduates; job seeking; South Africa

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 8: Decent work and economic growth

Metrics

Total abstract views: 256
Total article views: 225


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.