Original Research

Patient perceptions of physiotherapy and prehabilitation before hip and knee arthroplasty in South Africa

Prithi Pillay-Jayaraman, Allan R. Sekeitto, Verusia Chetty, Stacey Maddocks
African Journal of Disability | Vol 15 | a1763 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v15i0.1763 | © 2026 Prithi Pillay-Jayaraman, Allan R. Sekeitto, Verusia Chetty, Stacy Maddocks | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 29 May 2025 | Published: 08 April 2026

About the author(s)

Prithi Pillay-Jayaraman, Physiotherapy Private Practice, Dr. GM Pitje Day Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa; and Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
Allan R. Sekeitto, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa; and Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
Verusia Chetty, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
Stacey Maddocks, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa

Abstract

Background: Hip and knee joint arthroplasty in many low- and middle-income countries has lengthy waiting lists as trauma-related procedures are prioritised. A comprehensive care pathway that includes prehabilitation can enhance patient outcomes. Prior to designing an impactful service, a contextually grounded study with an understanding of current knowledge, relationship between felt and expressed needs in the specific socio-cultural setup is critical.
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate patients’ knowledge and perceptions of physiotherapy and prehabilitation before undergoing total hip or knee replacement operations in a South African public healthcare setting.
Method: A mixed-methods approach utilising semi-structured, face-to-face interviews and questionnaires was employed. Patients in the orthopaedic outpatient queue who consented to participate were recruited. Forty-nine participants answered the questionnaires, and seven patients were interviewed. Questionnaire data were analysed descriptively, including estimates of means and percentages and qualitative data by content analysis.
Results: A significant (p < 0.001) 77.6% (38) of patients indicated that they were unsure of the role of a physiotherapist, and 67.3% (33) of respondents were unsure of the necessity for pre-operative exercises (p < 0.001). Three main themes emerged from the interviews, which were patients’ preconceptions of physiotherapy, the perceived value of prehabilitation and patients’ recommendations regarding physiotherapy and prehabilitation.
Conclusion: This study identified a lack of knowledge and understanding regarding physiotherapy and prehabilitation among these patients.
Contribution: The findings of this study may inform the design of a prehabilitation programme tailored to this context and highlighted a need for the education of medical personnel.


Keywords

arthroplasty; physiotherapy; prehabilitation; knowledge; perception

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 3: Good health and well-being

Metrics

Total abstract views: 152
Total article views: 152


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.